this is a breaking change, but there's no way around that, since the opt
param was left off initially.

(I kinda hate how long some of these names are... I'd much rather just
call them "subscriptions", but the API docs is pretty consistent about
calling them "repository subscriptions", so that's what we go with.
Maybe the intend to later add other kinds of subscriptions?)

add tests for User.Edit and User.GetKey

User keys can no longer be updated.  Instead, they should be deleted and
re-added.

This tool help to identify fields being returned by the GitHub API that
are not currently being mapped onto our Go data types.  Some of these
may be deliberate omissions, so these checks should only be treated as
an aid in identifying these fields, not as an absolute list of fields to
be added.

The test public key used in these tests is a key that I just generated
specifically for this purpose.  I deleted the associated private key, so
even if someone accidentally left this attached to their account, it
should have no effect.  Of course, I have no way of actually proving
that I deleted the private key, so uh... yeah.  All the more reason to
never run these integration tests using a "real" GitHub account, always
use a dedicated test account.

The GitHub docs don't make it completely clear that AddEmails is also
switching to the new v3 response format, but new integration tests
verify that it is.

This is a breaking change, but it appears that this method has been
broken for some time now and no one has complained yet, so I'm going to
assume no one is using it yet.

Notably, this is also the first (of many, I'm sure) bug I've discovered
while working on the new integration tests (#98).  Yay for better tests!

Signed-off-by: Ondrej Kupka <ondra.cap@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: Ondrej Kupka <ondra.cap@gmail.com>

notably, this also updates client.Do() to handle non-JSON response
bodies by passing an io.Writer as the final argument, v.

With this code it should be possible to tick the ‘Content’ box in issue
#37. The code is written after reviewing PR #64 and so is (very)
loosely based on that PR. So big thanks for the work already done by
@octavore! I did however had some different insights about a few fixes
and as the PR hasn’t moved for the last 5 months, I thought to just
rewrite and PR and I send in a new PR hoping to come to a merge…

Signed-off-by: Ondrej Kupka <ondra.cap@gmail.com>

This is primarily needed to allow the test to run unmodified in certain
specialized environments (namely, Google's build clusters)

This is a BREAKING CHANGE due to the change in the ListMembers method
signature.

(Ali is a Googler, so no change to AUTHORS file)

(Alex is a Googler, so no change to AUTHORS file)

Using an *Issue in IssuesService.{Create,Edit} means that the Labels
and Assignee fields do not serialize to the correct JSON representation
for the GitHub API. This change introduces an IssueRequest struct to
use instead, allowing labels and assignees to be set on create or edit.

Inspired by the Ruby version [1], UploadReleaseAsset now accepts a
simple path to a file.

The Content-Type is now determined internally using the
mime.TypeByExtension() function.

Note this version is also more flexible. Indeed, the previous version
needed an io.Reader, but actually only 3 kinds of io.Reader were bore.
This is because of http.NewRequest needs to determine the Content-Length
of the body, and it can only determine it for bytes.Buffer, bytes.Reader
or strings.Reader [2]. Note there is an issue raised about this [3].

With a path to a file, we can easily determine the file size, and then
manually add it to the request.

[1]
https://github.com/octokit/octokit.rb/blob/master/lib/octokit/client/releases.rb#L85
[2] http://golang.org/src/pkg/net/http/request.go#L447
[3] https://code.google.com/p/go/issues/detail?id=6738

This commit adds support for Git refs.

Listing of refs does not support sub-namespaces.